[narten at us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

Andrew Alston aa at tenet.ac.za
Sat Apr 15 13:48:05 CEST 2006


Hi Roger,

I don't know if its just me, but this seems like a rather futile 
response.  Where people have put a lot of work into something, the least 
you could do when coming back with a message like this, is to explain 
the reasoning behind the post.  I'm curious as to exactly what you mean 
by this?  Care to explain, rather than to flame?

Thanks

Andrew Alston

Roger Jorgensen wrote:

>On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 james at towardex.com wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm sure many of you have already seen this... but finally the community
>>has spoken: PI /48 for end-sites :)
>>
>>Looks like we're almost there... many thanks to everyone, Kevin and Owen who 
>>voiced this issue at ARIN meetings!
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for ruining ipv6 as a good alternative to IPv4.
>
><snip>
>
>
>  
>




More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list