v6 routing pessimism

[Alexander Koch]

On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:14:51 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:05:22PM +0300, Juha Suhonen wrote:
> > We "fixed" this same issue today for ourselves by filtering 
> > 2001:610:240::/42 off - apparently somebody doesn't care about the 
> > "no-export" tag set by RIPE on all their peers.. Please, correct me if I'm 
> > wrong, but if you don't directly peer with RIPE you shouldn't see this 
> > more-specific prefix at all?
> 
> Good point, indeed. Alexander? ;)

First of all I 'fixed' the HE thing for me. Not sure how
many emails or IRC comments I got for this per week but it
were too many.

With regards to RIPE's /42 we overwrite our peering partners
community like we do in good old v4 world. We accept more
specs with no-export on specific request from certain peers,
but only on specific request and where it makes any sense at
all. Having had the same issue with another /48 I do invite
my peers to not announce stuff to me that they tag no-export.

Regards,
Alexander,
just in a practical mood