New RIPE allocations outside 2001::/16 - filter update time!
James
james at towardex.com
Mon May 2 18:51:13 CEST 2005
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:49:18AM -0400, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> >On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:05:16AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> >>To pick a "/48s are bad" advocate at random, the following are examples
> >>of legitimate /48 advertisements from ARIN space that you might
> >>consider permitting:
> >>
> >>2001:500::/48 -- F root nameserver
> >>2001:500:1::/48 -- H root nameserver
> >>2001:500:2::/48 -- C root nameserver
> >>2001:500:3::/48 -- L root nameserver
> >
> >Hm, I cannot see the last two anywhere floating around. Are they
> >supposed to be visible currently?
>
> Nor do I see any of these at the Federal GigaPOP, AS 2884.
>
> Perhaps my upstream network is aggressively filtering /48's ....
>
> wfms
Nah, your upstream is probably fine. Appears last two are not advertised
to GRT at this time.
I can't see here either , while we are surely accepting /48s from
2001:500::/30 space :)
FYI, these are the only two prefixes I see under 2001:500::/32 scope:
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* 2001:500::/48 2001:418:0:4000::11
0 200 0 2914 3557 i
* 2001:5014:100:1::1
200 0 1273 3557 i
*>i 2001:4f8:4:b:290:6900:b30:541f
0 200 0 3557 i
*> 2001:500:1::/48 2001:5014:100:1::1
110 0 1273 11537 668 13 i
--
James Jun
Infrastructure and Technology Services
TowardEX Technologies
Office +1-617-459-4051 x179 | Mobile +1-978-394-2867
james at towardex.com | www.towardex.com
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list