New RIPE allocations outside 2001::/16 - filter update time!

James james at towardex.com
Mon May 2 18:51:13 CEST 2005


On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:49:18AM -0400, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> >On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:05:16AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> >>To pick a "/48s are bad" advocate at random, the following are examples
> >>of legitimate /48 advertisements from ARIN space that you might
> >>consider permitting:
> >>
> >>2001:500::/48 -- F root nameserver
> >>2001:500:1::/48 -- H root nameserver
> >>2001:500:2::/48 -- C root nameserver
> >>2001:500:3::/48 -- L root nameserver
> >
> >Hm, I cannot see the last two anywhere floating around. Are they
> >supposed to be visible currently?
> 
> Nor do I see any of these at the Federal GigaPOP, AS 2884.
> 
> Perhaps my upstream network is aggressively filtering /48's ....
> 
> wfms

Nah, your upstream is probably fine.  Appears last two are not advertised
to GRT at this time.

I can't see here either , while we are surely accepting /48s from
2001:500::/30 space :)

FYI, these are the only two prefixes I see under 2001:500::/32 scope:

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*  2001:500::/48    2001:418:0:4000::11
                                             0    200      0 2914 3557 i
*                   2001:5014:100:1::1
                                                  200      0 1273 3557 i
*>i                 2001:4f8:4:b:290:6900:b30:541f
                                             0    200      0 3557 i
*> 2001:500:1::/48  2001:5014:100:1::1
                                                  110      0 1273 11537 668 13 i


-- 
James Jun
Infrastructure and Technology Services
TowardEX Technologies
Office +1-617-459-4051 x179 | Mobile +1-978-394-2867
james at towardex.com | www.towardex.com



More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list