Consensus on MHAP/v6 Multi-homing

[Jeroen Massar]

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 13:55 +0100, jonathan.2.stevens at bt.com wrote:
> > But since when did IX's become transits? Or did they made
> > a mistake when naming their organization?
> 
> > UK6X is afaik an IX, not an ISP.
> 
> Those two kinds of entities are not always 100% distinct.
> An LIR IX provides some services that are usually provided by an ISP.

Either you are an IX and you fall in RIPE land under RIPE-282.
Or you are a transit/ISP and you fall under RIPE-267.

Take your pick. As far as I read it now you are an ISP, not an IX.

Greets,
 Jeroen

(PS: address-policy-wg at ripe.net anyone? :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20050420/6add5ba5/attachment.sig>