[Fwd: New IPv6 allocations from IANA to RIPE NCC (2a00::/21) and ARIN (2600::/22, 2604::/22, 2608::/22, 260c::/22)]

[Rico -mc- Gloeckner]

On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:34:19AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:07:25AM +0200, Rico -mc- Gloeckner wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:41:47PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > > This sort of looks like "ICANN is sticking to the classic /21 allocations,
> > > but four BIG requests have been made, been granted a /22, and ICANN is
> > > trying to reserve room for growth".
> > 
> > Should'nt this be a matter of the RIRs, instead of IANA/ICANN?
> 
> "this" being "what"?

I blindly assumed that "reserving room for growth" means growth of an
LIR.  IMVHO this should be left for the RIR to be done and IANA/ICANN
should give them enough space for the RIR to make plans about that.


-- 
http://www.ukeer.de/about.html

<many> kinder sind live immer suess. :)
<aphro> selber machen macht gluecklich :-P