[Fwd: New IPv6 allocations from IANA to RIPE NCC (2a00::/21)and ARIN (2600::/22, 2604::/22, 2608::/22, 260c::/22)]

[Jimmy Sadri]

Good point... I don't see the logic in allocating things that way either...
Maybe someone on the list who is associated with ICANN or IANA can shed some
light on the logic behind this...



-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6-ops-bounces+jimmys=myesn.com at lists.cluenet.de
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+jimmys=myesn.com at lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of
Gert Doering
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Bernhard Schmidt
Cc: ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: [Fwd: New IPv6 allocations from IANA to RIPE NCC (2a00::/21)and
ARIN (2600::/22, 2604::/22, 2608::/22, 260c::/22)]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:08:27PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> From: Doug Barton <barton at iana.org>
> To: doug.barton at icann.org
> 
> 
> And, the IANA has allocated the following four (4)
> IPv6 /22 blocks to ARIN:
> 
> 2600:0000::/22        ARIN
> 2604:0000::/22        ARIN
> 2608:0000::/22        ARIN
> 260C:0000::/22        ARIN

Does anyone know what they are smoking?

<politically correct>
What is happening here?  How do these allocations ICANN->ARIN come
to be?  Why are they allocating /22s at /14 (!) boundaries?

This sort of looks like "ICANN is sticking to the classic /21 allocations,
but four BIG requests have been made, been granted a /22, and ICANN is
trying to reserve room for growth".
</politically correct>

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  71007  (66629)

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234




================================================ 
Jimmy Sadri  CISSP, CCSP, CCNP, MCSE, MCSA
Network Engineer 
Network Security Analyst 
CBK Instructor 
Consultant