<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:03 AM Gert Doering <<a href="mailto:gert@space.net">gert@space.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">(What they *want* is "IPAM shows what IPv6 address is in use on which<br>
device in the network", which DHCPv6 would do nicely, including<br>
static assignments via DHCP reservations - while everything else<br>
relies on "IPv6/MAC ND logging on the router" or other disintegrated<br>
fumbling...)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Gert, have you asked why the solutions listed in <a href="https://theinternetprotocolblog.wordpress.com/2020/03/14/does-one-need-dhcpv6/">Enno's blog post</a> earlier in this thread don't work for them? Specifically, the router-based IP snooping and NDP monitoring features in switch platforms? Is it just that support for these features is patchy, and existing IPAMs do not support them? Or is there some deeper problem? What can we do to make this better? Yes, using IA_NA would address this particular need, but it has disadvantages compared to SLAAC as well.</div></div></div>