<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Schäfer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thomas@cis.uni-muenchen.de" target="_blank">thomas@cis.uni-muenchen.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><a href="https://www.root.cz/clanky/sixxs-vypne-ipv6-tunely-sluzby-ukonci-6-cervna/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.root.cz/clanky/six<wbr>xs-vypne-ipv6-tunely-sluzby-<wbr>ukonci-6-cervna/</a><br></blockquote></div><br>The article sums it up quite well, and the author understood I think the rationale quite well. I've asked them to change the link at the top of their article from a WIP document that I had sent to the SixXS admin community this week, and instead point folks at <a href="https://www.sixxs.net/sunset/">https://www.sixxs.net/sunset/</a> which contains the rationale (also in Josh' forward upthread).</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Obviously many users will be asking questions, or simply saying thanks over the next few days. I intend to engage with the IPv6 community next week, although my thoughts are kind of wrapped up in the sunset rationale here. Do let me know if you have thoughts or further discussion points. Would be happy to collate them from *NOG, ipv6-* and publish those as well.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">All the best,</div><div class="gmail_extra">Pim</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Pim van Pelt <<a href="mailto:pim@ipng.nl" target="_blank">pim@ipng.nl</a>> <br>PBVP1-RIPE - <a href="http://www.ipng.nl/" target="_blank">http://www.ipng.nl/</a></div>
</div></div>