<br><br>On Monday, February 16, 2015, Lorenzo Colitti <<a href="mailto:lorenzo@google.com">lorenzo@google.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Anfinsen, Ragnar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ragnar.Anfinsen@altibox.no');" target="_blank">Ragnar.Anfinsen@altibox.no</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>>What does "IPv4 traffic lowers to...10%" mean here?<br>
><br>
>Is this 10% meant to suggest that you'll wait until 90% of the<br>
>Internet has IPv6, or when the average dualstack user's traffic mix<br>
>will reach 90% IPv6 to 10% IPv4?<br>
<br>
</div></div>The latter, apologies for being unclear... :)<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Actually, why not wait until 99.99% of the average dualstack user's traffic mix is IPv6? You seem on track to do that. :-P</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is called a free rider by economist. </div><div><br></div><div>< deleted Long rant was here , lots of hate></div><div><br></div>And of course, this is a network, and subject to Metcalf's law, so lack of deployment actively hurts all those who have made the investment in ipv6. <div><br></div><div>Simply: buying ipv4 not only feeds the global "digital divide", it actively hurts those that are trying to make a more inclusive global end-to-end internet. Users dont know or care about ipv4. Great businesses dont make decision on narrow near term shallow business cases. </div><div><br></div><div> business cases are just one of many tools. </div><div><br></div><more preachy text removed><br><div><br></div><div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>CB</div></div>