<div dir="ltr">Issue was already solved.<div><br></div><div>-Grant</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Jan Hugo Prins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jhp@jhprins.org" target="_blank">jhp@jhprins.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a> is an alias for <a href="http://pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.<u></u>com</a>.<br>
<a href="http://pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.<u></u>com</a> has address 91.225.248.129<br>
<a href="http://pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.<u></u>com</a> has IPv6 address 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881<br>
<br>
<br>
NetRange: 2620:109:C000:: - 2620:109:C00F:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:<u></u>FFFF:FFFF<br>
CIDR: 2620:109:C000::/44<br>
NetName: LINKEDIN<br>
NetHandle: NET6-2620-109-C000-1<br>
Parent: ARIN-V6-ENDUSER-BLOCK (NET6-2620-1)<br>
NetType: Direct Assignment<br>
OriginAS: AS20049<br>
Organization: LinkedIn Corporation (LINKE-1)<br>
RegDate: 2012-01-12<br>
Updated: 2012-02-08<br>
Ref: <a href="http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET6-2620-109-C000-1" target="_blank">http://whois.arin.net/rest/<u></u>net/NET6-2620-109-C000-1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://bgp01.as48972.net#" target="_blank">bgp01.as48972.net#</a> sh ipv6 bgp regexp _20049$<br>
BGP table version is 0, local router ID is 95.130.232.2<br>
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,<br>
r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed<br>
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete<br>
<br>
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path<br>
* 2620:109:c00d::/48<br>
2001:1540:800:4000::2:1<br>
90 0 16243 6939 14413 20049 i<br>
* i 2a02:d28:5580:e:1000::221<br>
90 0 5580 3356 14413 20049 i<br>
*> 2a02:d28:5580:e:1000::b5<br>
90 0 5580 3356 14413 20049 i<br>
<br>
Total number of prefixes 1<span class=""><br>
<br>
ping6 <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a><br>
PING <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a>(2620:109:<u></u>c007:102::5be1:f881) 56 data bytes<br></span>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=20.1 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=20.0 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=20.3 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=20.1 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=20.1 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=20.0 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=11 ttl=56 time=20.4 ms<span class=""><br>
^C<br>
--- <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a> ping statistics ---<br></span>
11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 10013ms<br>
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.067/20.215/20.435/0.135 ms<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 11/21/2014 09:09 PM, Thomas Schäfer wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
today the "internetsociety" has anounced that linkedin has joined the World<br>
IPv6 Launch Measurements Project. So far so good (marketing).<br>
<br>
But I was confused by using still IPv4.<br>
<br>
This company has more than one addresses.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://de.linkedin.com" target="_blank">de.linkedin.com</a> has no AAAA-Record. Ok, shit happens.<br>
<br>
but <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a> has an AAAA-Record.<br>
<br>
<br>
from home via DSL (Deutsche Telekom) I get this:<br>
<br>
ping6 <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a><br>
PING <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a>(2620:109:<u></u>c007:102::5be1:f881) 56 data bytes<br>
>From 2003:0:1803:8268::2 icmp_seq=3 Destination unreachable: No route<br>
>From 2003:0:1803:8268::2 icmp_seq=7 Destination unreachable: No route<br>
^C<br>
--- <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a> ping statistics ---<br>
8 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 16047ms<br>
<br>
from work via LRZ/DFN I get this:<br>
<br>
ping6 <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a><br>
PING <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a>(2620:109:<u></u>c007:102::5be1:f881) 56 data bytes<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=50.4 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=50.2 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=50.2 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=50.2 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=50.3 ms<br>
64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=50.1 ms<br>
^C<br>
--- <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" target="_blank">www.linkedin.com</a> ping statistics ---<br>
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5006ms<br>
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.199/50.293/50.446/0.158 ms<br>
<br>
I found also some other problems in 26.... but they are not so prominent.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.opus1.com" target="_blank">www.opus1.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.ipv6book.ca" target="_blank">www.ipv6book.ca</a><br>
<br>
Has anybody an idea? Can somebody confirm this problem by using a different<br>
isp?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Thomas<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>