<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Marco Sommani <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marco.sommani@iit.cnr.it" target="_blank">marco.sommani@iit.cnr.it</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class="h5"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">Well, I understand that there is value in moving towards an IPv6-only backbone, but, even in that case, I find it safer to provide IPv4 via DS-Lite rather than via 464xLAT. In my view, translating between different IP versions can only produce more problems.</span><br>
</div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Agreed. Actually, what you want is MAP-E. Unfortunately, in 3GPP networks, the encapsulation used by MAP-E breaks DPI mechanisms that many operators use for billing.</div>
</div>