<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Doug Barton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dougb@dougbarton.us" target="_blank">dougb@dougbarton.us</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">What I'm trying to point out here is that we've got NAT64/DNS64 sitting out there for well-meaning folks to stumble into with no idea that it's neither a thorough nor a robust solution. If 464xlat is the right answer to that particular problem then its proponents need to get to work on the HOWTOs.</span></div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6877">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6877</a></div></div><br></div></div>