<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
<br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div><br>> I see how this false sense of entitlement by the ISP may pose an<br>> operational problem. :)<br><br>Hmm, wow this chat is taking an interesting turn ;)<br><br>Thanks for your comments folks. I guess its still a matter of discussion. Would it be considered a false sense of entitlement for the ISP to number the provided device in IPv4 using the first IP of the network? Arguably if in IPv6 the ISP should not use a /64 out of the customer prefix for his edge device, the ISP should also route a second /30 to number his devices and route the IPv4 subnet to customer equipment as well?<br><br>Ron.<br><br></div> </div></body>
</html>