<div dir="ltr">No, still investigating since the services are dual stack. Stay tuned.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Gert Doering <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gert@space.net" target="_blank">gert@space.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:57:02AM -0500, Brzozowski, John Jason wrote:<br>
> Ole we actually have experience that tells us it would be bad if we turned<br>
> our relays. Some streaming service experience is already not optimal over<br>
> 6to4 using our relays largely related to the protocol not the relays<br>
> themselves. Turning ours down would result in the use of a single 6to4<br>
> relay on someone else's network. Further this relay is hosted by a<br>
> university. For now we think it makes more sense to keep our running and<br>
> encourage client side disablement until there is ~0 bits over 6to4.<br>
<br>
</div>Do you know why your clients are using 6to4 to access "some streaming<br>
service" in the first place? If they only have IPv4 and 6to4, they should<br>
not use IPv6.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Gert Doering<br>
-- NetMaster<br>
--<br>
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?<br>
<br>
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard<br>
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann<br>
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)<br>
Tel: <a href="tel:%2B49%20%2889%29%2032356-444" value="+498932356444">+49 (89) 32356-444</a> USt-IdNr.: DE813185279<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>