<div dir="ltr">Max I see quite a few 6to4 hosts that appear to be behind a home router ie the router itself is enabling 6to4. As long as the outside interface is unique 6to4 will work if I am not mistaken.</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Max Tulyev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:maxtul@netassist.ua" target="_blank">maxtul@netassist.ua</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 27.02.13 23:57, Dmitry Anipko wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I see a lot of BitTorrent traffic from Win7/WinXP preferring 6to4<->teredo.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
My understanding is that some peer to peer apps are explicitly using Teredo, because it gives them some amount of NAT traversal "for free".<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Yes, it's possible from Teredo side. But why 6to4 which can't be behind a NAT?<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
What exactly Win7/Win8 software prefer v4<->v4?<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
Chris's statement about preference is correct for apps which do not explicitly specify, what interface/address they want to use - e.g. user doing web browsing and the browser using mainstream Windows networking APIs to make a connection.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
- i.e. Internet Explorer only?<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>