<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com" target="_blank">brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">>> Suppose operators take the position that they don't want to upgrade the<br>
>> relays because most of the traffic on them comes from third party<br>
>> networks, and thus #1 is infeasible. What then?<br>
<br>
</div>Figure out how widely the route to 192.88.99.1 is advertised,<br>
which will tell you who is able to use the relay. It is strongly<br>
in a relay operator's interest to limit the advertisement of<br>
that route to networks that are welcome to use the relay.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Sure. And the 6to4 service in networks that don't do that gets worse. You can't get there from here.</div></div>
</div></div>