<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 17:13 +0900, Erik Kline wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
> I think rejecting on no DNS for ipv6 is going to be eve more a necessity
> than ever before with all thee IP's being dished out to end users.
Without siding for or against this policy, I would say that the right
time to get this hammered out is rapidly passing. This is something
that could, IMHO, still be enforced, albeit with some possible pain
for existing IPv6 MTA operators depending on the outcome. It might
not be too late.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
I thought we all would have learned the lessons from IPv4 days, but it seems some will just never learn.<BR>
<BR>
BTW, and this is NOT directed soley at Erik, but EVERYONE in this thread, this morning I see my inbox flooded with messages, ummmmm, we are all on the SAME mailing list, I, like most of you, don't need two copies... seems IPv6 also means we have to learn others all over again on how to respond to mailing list messages, and not CC every person who ends up in the thread *sigh*<BR>
I assume we have all been around long enough to know better <IMG SRC="cid:1313109131.7898.11.camel@tardis" ALIGN="middle" ALT=":)" BORDER="0"><BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>