<p><br>
On May 28, 2011 8:33 AM, "Daniel Roesen" <<a href="mailto:dr@cluenet.de">dr@cluenet.de</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:27:27PM +0200, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:<br>
> > > "The following Fix it solution will resolve the issue by configuring<br>
> > > your computer to prefer IPv4, instead of IPv6. By default, Windows<br>
> > > prefers IPv6 over IPv4. This Fix it solution is temporary, to resolve<br>
> > > issues on World IPv6 Day for affected Internet users. On June 10, 2011<br>
> > > at 12:00AM, your computer will be configured to prefer IPv6 again after<br>
> > > your next reboot."<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > Is it me, or is this very lame?<br>
> > > Sort of defeats the idea op an IPv6 day.<br>
> ><br>
> > Lame... if you want my advice.<br>
> ><br>
> > It is an obvious fix in case of issue, but, if every windows user<br>
> > applies this patch, then the purpose of the V6 Day is defeated IMHO...<br>
> ><br>
> > If the text said 'apply this patch ONLY if you have problem', then it<br>
> > would be OK (which is kind of written but not crystal clear)<br>
><br>
> Indeed. If only they would have invested the same energy in fixing ULA<br>
> preference, RA re-validation, 6to4 preference etc...</p>
<p>+1. Many sites are dual stack everyday. </p>
<p>Cb<br>
> Best regards,<br>
> Daniel<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: <a href="mailto:dr@cluenet.de">dr@cluenet.de</a> -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0<br>
</p>