<p><br>
On May 4, 2011 12:17 AM, "Roger Jørgensen" <<a href="mailto:roger@jorgensen.no">roger@jorgensen.no</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On tir, mai 3, 2011 23:02, Seth Mattinen wrote:<br>
> > On 5/3/2011 13:50, nick hatch wrote:<br>
> >> <a href="http://blog.linode.com/2011/05/03/linode-launches-native-ipv6-support/">http://blog.linode.com/2011/05/03/linode-launches-native-ipv6-support/</a><br>
> >> <a href="http://www.linode.com/IPv6/">http://www.linode.com/IPv6/</a><br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Only a /128 and they charge for more? Ugh, IPv4-think prevails, I<br>
> > suppose. I guess it's slightly better than nothing.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.vr.org/">http://www.vr.org/</a> also give you IPv6, 5 /128 and charges nothing, and<br>
> don't look like they charge for the next 5 either.<br>
><br>
></p>
<p>Really. I am surprised this is seen as a big deal. Softlayer and arp networks both provided a full /64 .... no charge ...</p>
<p>There are options .... people can sell what they want and you can buy what you want.</p>
<p>That said, lets get away from what is right and wrong. If it's the right service at the right price, go with it.<br>
You do have options. </p>
<p>Funny that 3gpp requires all phones to have /64 .... no options. </p>
<p>Cb<br></p>
<p>> --<br>
> ---<br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
> Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID<br>
> <a href="mailto:roger@jorgensen.no">roger@jorgensen.no</a> | - The Future is IPv6<br>
> -------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.<br>
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?<br>
> A: Top-posting.<br>
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?<br>
><br>
</p>