This article somehow managed to make it around my internal list at work. We stopped reading shortly after the text below too. It was hard to take this article seriously.<div><br></div><div>John<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Michael Sinatra <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael@rancid.berkeley.edu">michael@rancid.berkeley.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On 08/20/10 06:41, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Wow, what a well researched and balanced article this is:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/realworld/360418/why-you-shouldnt-worry-about-ipv6-just-yet/" target="_blank">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/realworld/360418/why-you-shouldnt-worry-about-ipv6-just-yet/</a><br>
<br>
I'm pondering if this article is actually sarcasm or if he is<br>
trolling.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Sorry, I stopped reading when I got to this line: "New devices are being added to the internet faster than Mexicans buy lottery tickets...." I am not one to cry "racism" all the time, but such a flip line seemed totally inappropriate, not to mention irrelevant. Such an article is not even worth reading. (And what I did read indeed seemed like baldfaced trolling, and he doesn't even appear to be terribly adept at that.)<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>
michael<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>===================================<br>John Jason Brzozowski<br>===================================<br>
</div>