<div dir="ltr"><div>The proper place for this is in the mailing list <a href="mailto:nat66@ietf.org">nat66@ietf.org</a> where all aspects of NAT in IPv6 were consolidated last year.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Eric<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 22:26, Stefan Kuttler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:u@netbeisser.de">u@netbeisser.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br>Hello IPv6-Ops,<br><br>what are your thoughts on this?<br><br><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00" target="_blank">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00</a><br>
<br>I would have thought that one has overcome NAT already.<br>Benfits from IPv4 NAT the ISPs will not want to give up:<br><br>* masking arbitrary nets<br>* oerhm ...<br><br><br>Best Regards<br>Stefan<br><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>Stefan Kuttler ( B.O.F.H. ) | u (at) <a href="http://netbeisser.de/" target="_blank">netbeisser.de</a><br></font></blockquote></div><br></div>