static IPs [was Re: ipv6-ops Digest, Vol 159, Issue 1]

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:07:42PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Not sure how many more 100's of messages are needed before we get to do
> something about it...

If something the IETF makes is not working properly out in the field, 
it's never the IETF's fault.  So you must be doing it all wrong.

The trick here seems to be to argue long enough to make people give up
and deploy IPv4 instead (lots of money to be made fixing other people's
NAT444 setups that nobody understand anymore, but "IPv4 is much easier!" -
just as a side note).

Seriously: I think your draft is a necessary document - whether to do it
in one or three documents, not sure, but maybe reaching individual 
consensus is easier.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20191026/94ebf94f/attachment.bin