Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

Michael Oghia mike.oghia at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 17:33:38 CEST 2016

Yes! Sorry about that Nick. Rob already clarified.


On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:

> Michael Oghia wrote:
> > Thanks Nick. Sad to hear, but hopefully we can change that.
> you're misunderstanding completely!  It means that ipv6 is considered to
> be of the same importance as ipv4 in the ixp world from the point of
> view of passing production traffic over the ixp fabric.  As far as the
> IXP world is concerned, this is an excellent situation to be in.
> Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20161020/18e663c0/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list