6to4 in Internet aaaa records
ek at google.com
Fri Oct 3 05:23:27 CEST 2014
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Erik Kline <ek at google.com> wrote:
> There in lies the problem. I have received escalations in the last few
>> days on my eyeball network regarding internet servers with 6to4 in DNS and
>> NAT64 WKP in DNS. In the WKP case, the server operator read the RFCs and
>> tried to pursued me to his understanding of those RFCs that i should route
>> and support WKP to my NAT64 and that he was doing the right thing by
>> putting the WKP as RR in his DNS files.
> That is hilariously evil...awesome. The *64 docs should have made some
> mention about not using the WKP globally.
Actually sections 3.1 and 3.2 of http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6052 apply
here. The implication is that since you can't route more specifics of the
WKP you shouldn't put them in DNS, but that latter is still not explicitly,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ipv6-ops