Routingproblems - Deutsche Telekom?
Grant Ridder
shortdudey123 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 29 18:44:10 CET 2014
Issue was already solved.
-Grant
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Jan Hugo Prins <jhp at jhprins.org> wrote:
> www.linkedin.com is an alias for pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.com.
> pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.com has address 91.225.248.129
> pop-idb2-alpha.www.linkedin.com has IPv6 address
> 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881
>
>
> NetRange: 2620:109:C000:: - 2620:109:C00F:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF
> CIDR: 2620:109:C000::/44
> NetName: LINKEDIN
> NetHandle: NET6-2620-109-C000-1
> Parent: ARIN-V6-ENDUSER-BLOCK (NET6-2620-1)
> NetType: Direct Assignment
> OriginAS: AS20049
> Organization: LinkedIn Corporation (LINKE-1)
> RegDate: 2012-01-12
> Updated: 2012-02-08
> Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET6-2620-109-C000-1
>
> bgp01.as48972.net# sh ipv6 bgp regexp _20049$
> BGP table version is 0, local router ID is 95.130.232.2
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal,
> r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> * 2620:109:c00d::/48
> 2001:1540:800:4000::2:1
> 90 0 16243 6939
> 14413 20049 i
> * i 2a02:d28:5580:e:1000::221
> 90 0 5580 3356
> 14413 20049 i
> *> 2a02:d28:5580:e:1000::b5
> 90 0 5580 3356
> 14413 20049 i
>
> Total number of prefixes 1
>
> ping6 www.linkedin.com
> PING www.linkedin.com(2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881) 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=20.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=20.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=20.3 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=20.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=20.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=20.2 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=20.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=11 ttl=56 time=20.4 ms
> ^C
> --- www.linkedin.com ping statistics ---
> 11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 10013ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.067/20.215/20.435/0.135 ms
>
>
>
> On 11/21/2014 09:09 PM, Thomas Schäfer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> today the "internetsociety" has anounced that linkedin has joined the
>> World
>> IPv6 Launch Measurements Project. So far so good (marketing).
>>
>> But I was confused by using still IPv4.
>>
>> This company has more than one addresses.
>>
>> de.linkedin.com has no AAAA-Record. Ok, shit happens.
>>
>> but www.linkedin.com has an AAAA-Record.
>>
>>
>> from home via DSL (Deutsche Telekom) I get this:
>>
>> ping6 www.linkedin.com
>> PING www.linkedin.com(2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881) 56 data bytes
>> >From 2003:0:1803:8268::2 icmp_seq=3 Destination unreachable: No route
>> >From 2003:0:1803:8268::2 icmp_seq=7 Destination unreachable: No route
>> ^C
>> --- www.linkedin.com ping statistics ---
>> 8 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time
>> 16047ms
>>
>> from work via LRZ/DFN I get this:
>>
>> ping6 www.linkedin.com
>> PING www.linkedin.com(2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881) 56 data bytes
>> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=50.4 ms
>> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=50.2 ms
>> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=50.2 ms
>> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=50.2 ms
>> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=50.3 ms
>> 64 bytes from 2620:109:c007:102::5be1:f881: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=50.1 ms
>> ^C
>> --- www.linkedin.com ping statistics ---
>> 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5006ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.199/50.293/50.446/0.158 ms
>>
>> I found also some other problems in 26.... but they are not so prominent.
>>
>> www.opus1.com
>> www.ipv6book.ca
>>
>> Has anybody an idea? Can somebody confirm this problem by using a
>> different
>> isp?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20141129/14af7e70/attachment.htm>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list