IPv6 Assignment for Server

[Tim Chown]

On 18 Jun 2014, at 10:49, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai <maillist.tk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Jens and Mark,
> 
> Is there any benefit to assign /112 mask ?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-why64-01

tim

> 
> --Te
> 
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 09:46:14 AM Jens Link wrote:
>> 
>>> It's always good to have more than one IP per server,
>>> this way you run multiple Servers per IP (e.g. DNS or
>>> HTTP). This might get a little dirty but sometimes it
>>> necessary. For internal Server I would go with a /64 or
>>> maybe a /112. With a normal /48 or /32 assignment you
>>> should have enough networks.
>> 
>> We normally assign /112's in static scenarios.
>> 
>> Where we or customers needs SLAAC, we assign a /64.
>> 
>> Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20140618/b4ce76ae/attachment.htm>