Tracing IPv6 packet drops resulting from Extension Headers (e.g. to Google)
Lorenzo Colitti
lorenzo at google.com
Tue Jul 1 21:30:12 CEST 2014
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Fernando Gont <fernando at gont.com.ar> wrote:
> I guess the question is why the dropping node seems to be M+2 rather
> than M+1 (based on public information, I was expecting Google to be the
> folks dropping the EH-enabled IPv6 packets rather
> than the Brazilian company above)?.
>
Are you sure you know who the router belongs to? Links between ASes are
often numbered using a shared subnet which may be registered to either of
the two ASes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20140701/52916a5f/attachment.htm>
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list