IPv6-only residential service (MAP, lw4o6)
Bjørn Mork
bjorn at mork.no
Sat Dec 6 21:53:17 CET 2014
Yannis Nikolopoulos <dez at otenet.gr> writes:
> p.s: 464xlat was never considered because I always thought of it as a
> mobile solution.
I don't see why. If you can enable some other tunnelling solution on the
CPE, then 464xlat should also be an option?
You still end up with the scaling challenge on your NAT64 gateways of
course. But that's at least well proven technology, if you take the
mobile deployments into account.
Bjørn
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list