IPv6-only residential service (MAP, lw4o6)

Philipp Kern phil at philkern.de
Sat Dec 6 21:14:42 CET 2014


On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 12:08:08PM -0800, Ca By wrote:
> I hear this argument frequently (stateful bad, stateless good) but it is
> seldom coupled with deployment experience.
> 
> Makes you wonder why some of the largest ipv6-only deployments are stateful
> (ds-lite, 464xlat, ...) and the stateless solutions are not even published
> as rfcs or deployed at scale yet?

I wonder if that can be correlated with vendor business interest.

Kind regards
Philipp 'And now I'll be considered a conspirary theorist' Kern


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list