Over-utilisation of v6 neighbour slots

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Thu Oct 24 13:27:34 CEST 2013

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:20:17PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Apple is free to provide a reasonable implementation right away...  not
> that they would change it, just because there is an RFC...

Given their ignorance of collateral damage done to operators, users
and IPv6 deployment in general by their implementation of Happy
Eyeballs (alias "Hampering Eyeballs"), I have zero hope.


I guess that a lot of the delta between the red and blue lines is AAPL
Hampering Eyeballs tax.

(what you see is a DS-Lite deployment at work... native IPv6 with
NATted IPv4).

Best regards,

CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list