Usage of fd00::/8 on the Interwebz - something with filters and uRPF

[Jan Boogman]

This has been fixed now, thanks for the heads up.

Jan

Am 30.05.2013 um 08:27 schrieb Jan Boogman <boogman at ip-plus.net>:

> hmm, this is the ip of our ServiceApp6 SVI interface, which C told us has only local significance, apparently this is not the case. 
> Time to renumber then.
> 
> Cheers
> Jan
> 
> Am 29.05.2013 um 21:59 schrieb Jeroen Massar <jeroen at massar.ch>:
> 
>> ...
>> 4  2001:7f8:1::a500:3303:1 (2001:7f8:1::a500:3303:1)  20.755 ms  20.763 ms  20.784 ms
>> 5  fd00:3303::1 (fd00:3303::1)  22.010 ms  21.984 ms  21.986 ms
>> 6  2a02:120c:1051:d010::1 (2a02:120c:1051:d010::1)  17.806 ms  17.889 ms  17.842 ms
>> 7  2a02:120c:1051:d010::1 (2a02:120c:1051:d010::1)  18.720 ms  18.593 ms  18.617 ms
>> ...
>> 
>> Hmmmm fd00::/8, that really should never ever be visible on the Internet, being Unique *LOCAL* Addresses.
>> And it does not look like they applied the randomness bit for picking a prefix either.
>> You would also almost think that a /28 is more than enough address space to put a few router loopbacks in.
>> 
>> It is apparently time for people to start checking their filters again because it seems that these packets leak into other ASNs too...
>> 
>> More generally, do recheck your network for BCP38 compliance, please do apply it and require your peers to do the same!
>> 
>> Greets,
>> Jeroen
>