http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test

Jeroen Massar jeroen at massar.ch
Fri May 10 17:14:36 CEST 2013


On 2013-05-10 17:06 , Max Tulyev wrote:
> Proto-41 or 6to4 is a point-to-point tunnels in any case. So if you want
> to communicate directly to the significant part of the world this way,
> you need to set up and maintain hundreds of tunnels, as well as hundreds
> of BGP sessions. Also you have to go through a long and hard
> administrative work to negotiate all those tunnels.
> 
> In our case, you need to set up only one tunnel and only one BGP session
> to the ROUTE SERVER, which provide you all the routing information about
> all the peers and prefixes.

Really...tunneled connectivity without link monitoring (can't with
tunnels), latency/throughput checks or quality checks using a route server?

As Randy would say: I suggest everybody else to use that!

Please though do not do this, it will just make IPv6 SUCK for everybody
using that.

For the few ISPs who are in a remote location who cannot get native
IPv6, let these people connect to their CLOSEST native connectivity point.

I'll repeat again: if you know of ISPs who want IPv6, but cannot get it,
let them send an email here. I am sure that various real transit
providers will make them offers they cannot refuse.


A setup like you propose with 6assist is fun for people who want to
LEARN how BGP works, but for real connectivity, please just do not do it.

Greets,
 Jeroen




More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list