http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test

[Ole Troan]

Max,

> I mentioned Slovenia as we have a request for BGP-enabled tunnel from
> Slovenia ;) So for some reasons people still want to use BGP-enabled
> tunnels in real life, even in conuntries with well implemented native IPv6.
> 
> The second reason to use 6assist instead of regular TB it is not depend
> of the actual load of tunnel server. If somebody download something huge
> through a tunnel broker server - the other people just share the tiny
> rest of the bandwidth...

if you go down this path, you could rather do BGP tunnelling.
as in run BGP sessions between the peers, exchange native IPv6 prefixes, but use a 6to4
next-hop. that achieves the mesh properties you are looking for with an existing mechanism.
of course someone will have to advertise a default route somewhere.

cheers,
Ole