multiple prefixes

Nick Hilliard nick at
Tue Feb 12 00:30:09 CET 2013

On 11 Feb 2013, at 23:01, Doug Barton <dougb at> wrote:
> Thanks to you and Nick for the update on RIPE. I'm pretty sure ARIN (where almost all of my effort is concentrated nowadays) has a different policy, but that's not central to my argument.

Should have been more clear here. There was never a requirement for multihoming for ipv4. There was for ipv6 but it was removed recently. It's never been clear to me why there is a divergence in policy between 4/6, but there is. 


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list