extending at the edge
nick at foobar.org
Thu Oct 11 11:08:13 CEST 2012
On 11/10/2012 09:55, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> No, I think IPv4-style NAT is precisely what he means. Think about it this
> way: if a provider wants to charge on a per-/128 basis, and the user only
> wants to pay the provider once but connect multiple devices, then the only
> way to do that is IPv4-style NAT. As I noted earlier, in this model
> (almost) everybody is worse off, but it's not clear that there's a way to
> avoid that happening.
yes, I meant ipv4 style NAT. Providers will hand out single /128s because
that is easy to do. Phone manufacturers will implement nat6 because their
users want to implement connection sharing like they had with ipv4. It sucks.
More information about the ipv6-ops