CloudFlare IPv6 BGP announcements - WTF guys?

Daniel Roesen dr at
Mon Jul 16 21:15:17 CEST 2012

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 03:45:43PM +0200, Oliver wrote:
> The whole thing is daft; even if you've got multiple upstreams, there's still 
> *nothing* preventing you from exposing only your /32 to the rest of the 
> internet and tagging more specifics with NO_EXPORT to each of your upstreams.

Not having a backbone pretty effectively does.

> If your modus operandi is to pollute the routing tables, you deserve all the 
> unreachability you get.

Wether you see /32 PA more-specifics from all the CDN nodes, or PI /48s
doesn't make a difference at all, technically.

Best regards,

CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list