1::1/128 + 2::2/128 - GRH Anomalies Delta (2012-08-17)
William F. Maton Sotomayor
wmaton at ottix.net
Fri Aug 17 13:30:28 CEST 2012
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
>> Regarding the prefix leaks: le sigh. Don't people ever learn not to accept
>> arbitrary crap from customers? Prefix leaks require stupidity on two
>> parts, not just one.
> Sadly just one. It's not like the default Cisco policy is to block routes.
> The path to a route leak is:
> router bgp X
> neighbor 2002::1:2:3:4 remote-as 5678
> TCP can come up before the next line is typed/pasted, even if they did configure a policy.
If only the implementation were changed to force the user to invoke the
'activate' command there might be some hope that we can all be saved.
Yeah, yeah, I know.
More information about the ipv6-ops