phil at philkern.de
Tue Aug 7 22:26:17 CEST 2012
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:16:07PM +0300, Shade wrote:
> Without having checked this, weren't neighbour solicitations sent with TTL
> 1 to avoid specifically this problem?
Well, yeah, the case I'm concerned about is traffic to non-existent addresses.
Not packets with solicitations themselves. Basically the router taking care of
getting its cache up-to-date. We already had the problem with ARP.
More information about the ipv6-ops