services on subnet-router anycast address?

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at
Mon Apr 23 19:00:26 CEST 2012

On 2012-04-23 14:24, Lutz Preßler wrote:
> Hello,
> I stumbled upon 2600:: beeing This sould
> necessarily be a subject-router anycast address. Is it "legal"
> and without implementation problems to have services on such
> an address? 

I can't think of any reason why a service on port 80 would
cause a problem, even if the node is also configured to
act as a router.


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list