Lack of IPv6 traffic stats makes judging progress difficult

Mark Smith nanog at
Tue May 24 23:06:20 CEST 2011

On Tue, 24 May 2011 18:28:14 +0200
Eugen Leitl <eugen at> wrote:

> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:21:19PM -0400, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols wrote:
> > A link and the first paragraph or so would have been fine. You didn't
> > need to copy and paste the whole article.
> Saves time, and avoids media breaks (many people are text-based).
> Also, web content tends to be ephemeral. Here today, and gone tomorrow.

And it's a copyright violation. You might not care about copyright
now, but one day you may produce something that you want the right to
choose whether or not and how it is copied (book, music, commercial or
open source software). Does your violation today entitle other people to
copy your work in the future how ever they like, despite your wishes?

More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list