IPv6 NAT (NAT66) - Implementations?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:00:19PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2011-May-23 15:24, Gert Doering wrote:
> [..]
> > (Please don't start a flame war now, I'm not endorsing - or condemning - 
> > anything, just summarizing responses)
> 
> There is only one correct question here: do those setups also support
> uPNP or NAT-PMP for IPv6?

I have not asked that, and that non-asked question has not been answered
yet...

> Nevertheless of course, if the NAT is there, why bother with more
> addresses, at least for clients... ;)

These implementations can all do N:N prefix translation, so this is not
N:1 NAT / masquerading... 

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20110523/7380539a/attachment.bin