A challenge (was Re: Default security functions on an IPv6 CPE)

[S.P.Zeidler]

Thus wrote Mark Smith (msmith at internode.com.au):

> Even if you disclaim that responsibility and state its limits when
> you chose to provide one limited component of the "security
> solution" , if a customer has a perception that you are taking
> complete responsibility, and they get breached, they can waste your
> time and money by taking you to court, encourage a class action
> against you etc. IOW, doing a small amount of limited security on
> your customers behalf creates an increased business risk.

Argument void where legal structure halfway sane.

Germany does not even have a "class action suit" construct, f.e.

regards,
	spz