An RFC is an RFC when it is an RFC (Was: Question Re: best practices)
tedm at ipinc.net
Mon May 9 23:55:19 CEST 2011
On 5/9/2011 2:46 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Den 9. mai 2011 23:21 skrev Ted Mittelstaedt<tedm at ipinc.net> følgende:
>>> There are others as well...
>> Post them. I would like to see multiple open source implementations
>> that are buildible on current OSes. I think that is far more in the
>> spirit of openness that the RFC system is built on.
> TAYGA — http://www.litech.org/tayga/ . It doesn't do the overload part
> of NAT44 (ie., one IPv6 address becomes one IPv4 address), but you can
> easily do that on top with regular iptables. (I feed it into a Cisco
> router which NATs for me, mostly for the fun of it.)
> /* Steinar */
Well, that's a start, but neither it nor the one at
http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca/ advertise RFC 6146 compliance, I
wonder if either of them are?
More information about the ipv6-ops