Experiences with IPv6 peering?

[Chase Venters]

I recently acquired my first native IPv6 address space for our
organization in the hopes that we could take a stab at participating in
World IPv6 day. Cogent provided the address space on connectivity they
provide us at the Dallas Infomart.

The first thing I tried to do was to ping some of my addresses on
Hurricane Electric's tunnelbroker, which I use at home. "No Route". Then
I found this:

http://ipv6.he.net/bgpview/24h_history/COGC-6NET-0001.html

I contacted Hurricane Electric, who informed me that Cogent doesn't have
a path to them.

The thought of being the "IPv6 engineer" in our firm and thusly being
the only one who wouldn't be able to access our site on world IPv6 day
is silly, but if I started putting in AAAA records that's just what
would happen.

Is this par for the course with IPv6 peering? What kind of improvement
are we likely to see between now and June?

We don't have any DNS magic like Google does (to try and hand out AAAAs
only to known good peers). We're using Dynect for DNS... they support
IPv6 but I don't think they have anything like Google's split view
technique implemented.

If I publish AAAA records on World IPv6 day, will I just be cutting off
some IPv6 users from our site? (Never mind the 0.1% of IPv6-broken users)

I should point out that I'm not trying to point the finger at Cogent...
to their credit, our other provider advertises IPv6 but their sales
people inform me it's only available on an optical GigE handoff and
won't be available on smaller circuits until at least 60-90 days. The
Cogent program is specifically labelled "Beta" and we had no problems
participating.

PS: If anyone is curious to ping me on Cogent, try 2001:550:2:49::1:2.

Thanks,
Chase

-- 
*Chase Venters*
Exceleron Software
+1-972-852-2718
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20110302/a8a2df1a/attachment.html