Philosophical question for IPv6 Day

[Arturo Servin]

	Get ride of ads with v6!

	Another reason to use v6.  =)

-as

On 9 Jun 2011, at 15:26, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 2011-06-09 17:17, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:21:16PM -0400, Bill Owens wrote:
>>> Which is better, at this stage of IPv6 deployment and transition:
>>> 
>>> - a fully dual-stacked website, functional for a v6-only client without resorting to v4, and located at a separate URL (www.ipv6, etc.)
>>> 
>>> or
>>> 
>>> - a v6-accessible skeleton at the main URL (www) that isn't functional by itself, and forces the client to use v4 to fetch a substantial amount of the content.
>>> 
>> 
>> 3rd option:
>> 
>> - a fully dual-stacked website, functional for a v6-only client, located at
>>  the main domain name
>> 
>> Which is what people have been doing years ago, and the Internet did not
>> come to an end...  time to stop finding excuses for non-deployment.
> 
> Exactly. It works fine for all three classes of users (v4-only, dual stack,
> and v6-only). If some advertising-related crap is v4-only, guess what -
> v6-only users don't see the ads, and only the lame advertiser gets hurt.
> The world is as it should be.
> 
>    Brian