allocating lowest 64 bits from WGS84
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Wed Jan 12 09:15:10 CET 2011
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:18:38PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> > and made sure that bit 70 is set to zero, indicating that the address
> > is not derived from a globally unique token e.g. MAC address, you
> > should be fine.
>
> Yeah, one has to figure that more than one device could possibly get the
> same x,y,z coordinates if they are on the shelf next to each other.
Yes, I would have prefered to resolve a cubic micron, but IPv6 doesn't
have spare space for that. Still, 24 bits gives you a resolution of about
2 meters on Earth surface at equator. GPS typically has an error ellipsoid
larger than that, so the nodes will unlikely to obtain the same three
numbers by a measurement (unless via a long-term measurement under
optimal conditions), and furthermore they would be probably communicating
with each other, ideally be able to determine their mutual distance by a
time of flight measurement (you do not need GPS radio if all nodes can
do mutual time of flight triangulation, with only a few absolute
reference points), or generally agree to jiggle their position by a bit
until they no longer collide.
So I don't think it's a real problem. By the time nodes are unformly
spaced less than 2 m apart IPv6 as we know it won't exist, anyway.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list