allocating lowest 64 bits from WGS84

[Eugen Leitl]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:06:31AM +0100, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> Beside the U/L bit which should be enforced, I do not see which
> recommendation it would break.
> 
> Of course, DAD could lead to some interesting cases ;-)

At least address collisions would take care of
themselves, given enough velocity ;)
 
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE