IPv6 in the enterprise

[S.P.Zeidler]

Thus wrote Simon Leinen (simon.leinen at switch.ch):

> Mark Smith writes:
> > sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> 
> >> However, we expect a significant number of (primarily) servers to
> >> have static addresses and a statically configured next hop, using a
> >> GUA.
> 
> > Who is in the "we" group your are talking about?
> 
> I'll join Steinar here... a significant number of servers is configured
> this way today for IPv4, which will make it attractive for at least some
> admins to do it that way.  I'm not saying this is "right", but people
> will tend to stick with the (possibly broken) ways they have done things
> for years.  And in this case I can see some benefits:

So can I. I've got a resolver that changed hardware three times in
the past 6 months and fixing up the address wherever it appears is getting
old.

regards,
	spz
-- 
spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)