How far has the Internet come with IPv6 Adoption?
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Apr 20 18:26:44 CEST 2011
They only mention proto-41, but not others ... So not really sure the
complete picture is there. Even do, they say only 1% for proto-41, and
this is a very small fraction of what other measurements report, so I'm
not convinced the methodology is good enough.
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: "Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols" <sjvn at vna1.com>
Organización: Vaughan-Nichols & Associates
Responder a: "Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols" <sjvn at vna1.com>
Fecha: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:49:38 -0400
Para: ipv6-ops <ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de>
Asunto: Re: How far has the Internet come with IPv6 Adoption?
>On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 08:25 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>
>>
>> They did. If you think there's a problem with the study then
>> have ATLAS send you a darknet probe and stick it on your network.
>
>Exactly so. Here's the methodology Arbor used:
>
>http://jon.oberheide.org/files/sigcomm10-interdomain.pdf
>
>Steven
>--
>Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
>Editor-in-Chief, Practical Technology: http://www.practical-tech.com
>QOTD: "It is never too late to be what you might have been."--George
>Eliot
>
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list