6to4 stats found, are there other places?
    Nick Hilliard 
    nick at foobar.org
       
    Mon Apr 18 12:38:27 CEST 2011
    
    
  
On 18/04/2011 01:31, Doug Barton wrote:
> In some cases that's true, however some (including me) want to kill it
> outright. Unfortunately that's not the opinion of even a substantial
> minority of the WG however.
I think most people want it gone.  Problem is, it's difficult to remove and 
it will take a long, long time before it disappears completely.  The 
approach that's most likely to get widespread support is:
1. make it not be on by default
2. make noise about it being A Bad Thing
3. deprioritise 2002::/16 addresses in resolver libs
4. then make the option hard to find on operating systems / CPEs
5. then remove the option on operating systems
6. then slowly decommission 6to4 relays over many years
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic deals with steps 1-3.
Nick
    
    
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list